Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 07:09
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Who would win, an F-22 Raptor or Tie Defender?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
New Report: Flooding is Now NYC’s Biggest Threat - Boro Park 24
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
The 6 Best Cereals to Help Lower Cholesterol, According to Dietitians - EatingWell
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Is it possible for the U.S. government to get rid of the constitution for national safety?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
FAA Says Newark Airport Should Be OK by October - Newser
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Are there any guys, crossdressers, or transgender girls here who wear tampons?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Over-the-counter supplement could prevent heart disease in type 2 diabetes patients - Medical Xpress
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Private-sector firms added just 37,000 jobs in May, the lowest total in more than two years - CNN
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Over 40? Eating These Carbs Could Boost Your Healthy Aging Odds by 37% - bestlifeonline.com